Damages of Climate Change

 

Home ] Up ]

 

 Agriculture Sea Level Rise  Forests Water Supply Increased Energy Use    Insurance Health Air Pollution  Water Pollution Migration                                    Human amenity Ecosystem and  biodiversity lossExtreme weather events 

Agriculture

Climate change is expected to benefit agriculture in some areas, and harm the sector in other regions.  It is not clear which of these two groups the United States fits into because of differing estimates {5}.  

Climate change will damage agriculture in some regions because of heat stress, decreased soil moisture, and an increased incidence of pests and diseases due to increasing temperatures. However, in colder regions where plant growth is limited by forst, climate change is will likely increase crop yields due to extended growing seasons{2,4}.

Climate change may also produce gains for the agriculture sector in some regions, even in the United States.  As climate change occurs, the higher atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide may increase photosynthesis.  Laboratory experiments have shown that the anticipated doubling of CO2 atmospheric concentrations could increase crops such as wheat, rice, soybeans by 34%.  These same experiments also suggest that climate change may induce a 40% increase in maize and sorghum crop yields{3}.  A most recent study also suggests that crop yields of citrus fruits and tomatoes may also increase as a result of climate change{5}.  However, it is disputed whether the results of laboratory experiments can be replicated in open field conditions due to potential limits on the availability of water and nutrients {2,4}.

Because of the disagreements concerning the effects of climate change on crop production, estimates of damages to agriculture are equally conflicting.  The discrepancies in estimates listed below are primarily a product of differing assumptions about the effect of CO2 fertilization, the assumed changes in temperature and precipitation, and the inclusion of adaptation and trade effects {3}.

The results of some of the more prominent studies concerning the impacts of climate change are presented in the table below.

Damage Estimates of the Agriculture Sector

Study Assumptions Damage Estimate
Cline (1992) assumed a doubling of CO2 atmospheric concentrations $18.5 B annually for United States
Mendelsohn (1993) 2.8oC warming; 8% increase in precipitation; made differing assumptions about the value of land $8.0 B - -1 B (net gain) annually for United States
Mendelsohn and Neumann (1999) included citrus fruits and tomatoes; included room for northern migration of crops into other production areas; livestock sector data updated; dynamic component included -11.3 B (net gain) annually for United States
Nordhaus (1991) CO2 atmospheric concentrations increase to 660 ppm. $1.1 B annually for United States

Sources:   Climate Change 1995: Social and Economic Dimensions of Climate Change. New York:  Cambridge University Press, 1996; The Impact of Climate Change of the United States Economy.  Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press, 1999. 

Sea Level Rise

Due to climate change, sea levels are expected to rise approximately 46 cm by the year 2100.  With a discrete warming shock, sea levels are anticipated to continue to rise for up to 500 years.  As a result, many studies have assumed that we will experience a 1 m sea level with a doubling of atmospheric concentrations of CO2{2,3,4} .  To adapt to these changing conditions, states would need to build appropriate structures to prevent flooding {2,3,4}.

 Listed in the table below are several studies that have estimated damage caused from sea level rise, the assumptions of these studies, and their actual cost estimates.

Damage Estimates of Sea Level Rise

 

Study

 

 

Assumptions

 

Damage Estimate

Protection Costs

   
 

US EPA (1989)

 

1 m sea level rise by the year 2100

 

$73 B-$111 B for the United States

 

Cline (1992)

1 m sea level rise; capital costs spread over 100 year period  

$1.2 B capital costs for the United States

 

Fankhauser (1995)

Annuitized costs; 50 cm sea level rise $1 B worldwide
 

Land Loss

   
Cline (1992) 1 m sea level rise by the year 2100;  6650 m2 loss of dry land; 6370 m2 loss of wetlands; $10,000 capital cost per acre of wetlands; $4,000 capital cost of dry land; rental opportunity cost of 10% $5.8 B for the United States
Fankhauser (1995) 50 cm sea level rise; wetlands loss of 33% worldwide; wetlands cost of $20,000 per acre $45.6 B Worldwide

Source:  Climate Change 1995: Social and Economic Dimensions of Climate Change. New York:  Cambridge University Press, 1996. 

 

Forests

The impact of climate change on forests is rather uncertain; however, it is predicted that climate change will benefit some regions and harm others.  The major climate-related changes on forests will be a change in season climate, patterns, water shortages, and rate of climate change.

Current models are necessarily based upon equilibrium climate change because of the limitations of static vegetation model used.  These models cannot deal with transient responses; however, they can provide estimates of quantitative changes in vegetation under future climates.  Nevertheless, because the number of vegetation classes used in models is limited, the changes are likely underestimated. Many estimates of 

damages were  based on an early study by Sedjo and Solomon (1989), who estimated equilibrium doubling of CO2 would decrease the biomass boreal forests by 40%, decrease temperate forests biomass by 1.3%, and increase tropical forests by 12%{2,3}. 

Transient effects over as much as three centuries are expected to be much more severe.  While the boundaries for growth of species will migrate poleward 600 km-100 km over the next century, forests can normally only adapt to a 100 km-200 km migration within this time span. As a result, dieback within the low latitudes is expected to exceed growth in the poleward boundaries{2,3}. As a result, forests in the Great Lakes Region could lose 23-54% of this biomass while forests in the Western Region may lose up to 40% of their biomass{2,3}.

Listed below is a table of models that have estimated the impacts of climate change on forests, the major assumptions of these models, and damage estimates.

Damage Estimates of Forest Loss

Study Assumptions Damage Estimates
Cline (1992) Loss of 40% US forests; value of annual wood extraction is $10B; Does not attempt to measure nonmarket values  

$3.3 B annually for the United States

 

Titus (1992) Biomass loss of 34% in 30 states; values of forests

$44 B annually for United States (central estimate)

Callaway (1994) Loss of softwood yields is partially offset by increase in hardwood yields; producers gain from increased prices but consumers face losses; uses two scenarios in which warming is 2.50C with fertilization and 4.00C without fertilization.

$2.5 B - $12.0 B annually for United States

Fankhauser (1995) Decrease in boreal forest biomass by 40%, decrease in temperate forest biomass by 1.3%, and an increase in tropical forest by 12%; forest values of $2000 km2 for high income countries, $400 km2 for middle income countries, and $200 km2 for low income countries.

$1.8 B in OECD countries; $2 B worldwide

Mendelsohn and Neumann (1999) 2.5oC warming; 7% increase in precipitation; doubling of atmospheric concentrations of CO2; uses dynamic climate, ecological, and timber modeling in an effort to correct deficiencies of earlier models. -3.4 B annually United States

Source:  Climate Change 1995: Social and Economic Dimensions of Climate Change. New York:  Cambridge University Press, 1996; The Impact of Climate Change of the United States Economy.  New York:  Cambridge University Press, 1999. 

 

Water Supply

Due to anticipated changes in precipitation, climate change may place considerable stress on water supplies in some areas.  Changes in the rates, timing, and intensity of precipitation combined with changes in evapotranspiration rates will ultimately decrease soil moisture.  If precipitation in some area actually decreases or does not increase enough to account for increase evaporation rates induced by increasing temperatures, this disparity between precipitation and evaporation rates wil lead to decreases in soil moisture {3}

Due to anticipated changes in precipitation, climate change may place considerable stress on water supplies in some areas.  Changes in the rates, timing, and intensity of precipitation combined with changes in evapotranspiration rates will ultimately decrease soil moisture.  If precipitation in some area actually decreases or does not increase enough to account for increase evaporation rates induced by increasing temperatures, this disparity between precipitation and evaporation rates will lead to decreases in soil moisture {3}

Coastal areas are another region that will potentially suffer from considerable stress on water supplies.  In many coastal areas affected by sea level rise, saltwater will likely intrude freshwater supplies.  Thus, considerable stress will be placed on the water supplies of these areas as well {3}.

Damages Estimates of Stress to Water Supply

Study Assumptions Damage Estimate
Cline (1992) Assumes a 10% reduction in water supplies (central estimate); estimates annual withdrawals of water to be .4 billion acre-feet; unit price of water is $250 per acre foot for commercial purposes and $100 per acre foot for agricultural purposes. $7 B annually for United States
Mendelsohn and Neumann (1999) 2.5oC warming; 7% increase in precipitation; used integrated hydrologic and economic models to improve upon previous methodologies. $3.7 B annually for United States

Sources:  Climate Change 1995: Social and Economic Dimensions of Climate Change. New York:  Cambridge University Press, 1996; The Impact of Climate Change of the United States Economy.  New York:  Cambridge University Press, 1999; Global Warming:  The Economic Stakes.  Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1992.

 

Increased Energy Use in Cooling and Heating

Due to increasing average temperatures, climate change is anticipated to increase cooling costs for some regions and decrease heating costs for other areas.  The EPA has estimated a 20-30% increase in electricity demand in the South; a 10-20% increase in the Rocky Mountain and North Central States; a 10-20% increase in California and the Mid-Atlantic states; and a decrease in energy demand in the most northeastern states{2}. However, its net effect on energy costs is highly disputed.  

The table below suggests some of the different estimates economics have provided for increased energy use.

Damage Estimates of Increased Energy Use

Study Assumptions

Damage Estimates

US EPA (1989) 20% increase in electricity demands above baseline due to 3.70C warming by 2055 $53 B increased operating costs; $224 billion capital costs for United States
Cline (1992) Present-day economy; 2.50C warming $11.2 B annual for United States

 

Titus (1992) Present day economy; 2.50C warming $5.6 B annually for United States
Rosenthal et al. (1994) Assume greater proportional increases in cooling estimates (14% decrease in heating costs and 16% increase in cooling costs per 10C warming); 2.5oC warming $7.6 B annually for United States
Fankhauser (1995) Increase in electricity demand of 3.2% for all regions except the former Soviet Union, whose electricity would decrease because of higher temperatures $23 B annually Worldwide
Mendelsohn and Neumann (1999) 2.5oC warming; 7% increase in precipitation; doubling of atmospheric concentrations of CO2; includes all space conditioning fuels. $2.5 B annually for United States.

Source:  Climate Change 1995: Social and Economic Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press, 1996;The Impact of Climate Change of the United States Economy.  Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press, 1999. 

Insurance

Since the insurance industry protects people from damage caused by unexpected events likely to occur because of climate change, this sector of the economy is likely to be impacted by the effects of climate change itself.  The result of such impacts may be increased insurance premiums or changes to insurance contracts so as to restrict the liability of the insurer {3}

The insurance industry has been burdened by insurance claims by a string of extreme weather events since 1987.  If climate change signals a trend toward increase frequency and severity of storms, then insurance companies may not be able to honor their contracts, and will thus weaken other important economic sectors such as banking.  To prevent such an occurrence, insurance companies may have to increase premiums or deny to coverage to some people living in the climate change-expanded areas of vulnerability{4}.  Regardless of which of these scenarios becomes reality, either case is likely to have significant impacts on social and economic welfare. 

 

Health

The impacts of climate change on health are numerous and varied.  Climate change may increase the number of heat-related deaths, the occurrence of respiratory diseases, and instances of vector-borne infectious diseases.  However, it is anticipated that the number of winter related deaths will decrease.  Nevertheless, there is a general consensus that the number of deaths will more than off-set the decrease in winter related mortality. 

The impacts of climate change on health are numerous and varied.  Climate change may increase the number of heat-related deaths, the occurrence of respiratory diseases, and instances of vector-borne infectious diseases.  However, it is anticipated that the number of winter related deaths will decrease.  Nevertheless, there is a general consensus that the number of deaths will more than off-set the decrease in winter related mortality{3,4}

The impacts of climate change on health are numerous and varied.  Climate change may increase the number of heat-related deaths, the occurrence of respiratory diseases, and instances of vector-borne infectious diseases.  However, it is anticipated that the number of winter related deaths will decrease.  Nevertheless, there is a general consensus that the number of deaths will more than off-set the decrease in winter related mortality{3}

According to various studies, there is a U-shaped relationship between death and temperature, with mortality increasing as a product of temperature extremes.  Consequently, the lowest death rates occur when temperatures remain between 16oC and 25oC{3}.  

Cline (1992) and Faukhauser (1995) used a statistical analysis by Kalkstein (1989) that sought to predict the relationship between death and temperature to estimate the increased mortality rates that may occur as a result of climate change.  According to their estimates, human mortality may increase by 27-40 persons per million in population, depending on the rate of climate change.    Using this prediction as a guideline, this increase in human mortality translates into at least 6,000-9,000 additional deaths annually for the US population{3}.

Damage Estimates of Increased Human Mortality Rates

Study Assumptions

Damage Estimates

     
Cline (1992) Increased mortality of 27-40 additional persons annually; used lifetime earnings to place a value on statistical life of humans ($595,000) $5.8 B annually for United States
Fankhauser (1995) 138,000 additional annual deaths Worldwide; value of statistical life estimates of $100,000 to $1.5 M depending of income levels in the region $10 B annually for United States; $49 B Worldwide
Tol (1995) 215,000 casualties worldwide; value of a statistical life is $250,000 + 175 (annual income per capita) $188 B Worldwide

Source:  Climate Change 1995: Social and Economic Dimensions of Climate Change. New York:  Cambridge University Press, 1996. 

Due to changes in temperatures and precipitation patterns, climate change may also increase deaths by expanding the area in which disease-carrying insects can live.  For instance, the World Health Organization has suggested that area in Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Kenya that were previously unaffected by such diseases, may be invaded by disease-carrying vectors.  A study on Indonesia has predicted a 20-25% increase in the number of malaria cases by the end of the twenty-first century.  A global study predicted a 10-30% increase in malaria cases{3}.  Cline (1992) addresses the issue, but makes minor efforts to quantify damages, commenting that a mere .5% increase in annual health costs would be over $3 B{2}.Although studies concerning the potential increases in Malaria cases in the United States are inconclusive, it is recognized that climate change will have a indirect effect on mortality rates in other regions by introducing new areas to deadly diseases. 

Air Pollution 

Climate change is also expected to increase urban problems with air pollution.  Numerous studies have confirmed that there is a positive relationship between temperature and atmospheric concentrations of ozone.  The EPA has estimated that a 2.5oC increase in global temperatures would increase ozone concentrations by 10%.  This would double the number of cities out of compliance with current air quality standards{3}.    

The results of studies conducted on this issue appear in the table below. 

Damage Estimates of Air Pollution

Study Assumptions

Damage Estimates

US EPA (1989) Need to reduce VOC emissions in the US by 700,000 tons from 2000 baseline to offset the effects of 10% increase in ozone concentrations caused by a doubling of CO2 atmospheric concentrations; cost of emissions abatement is $5,000 per ton. $3.5 B annually for United States
Cline (1992) Based estimates on findings of US EPA $3.5 B annually for United States
Titus (1992) Based on estimates primarily on findings of US EPA; projects a emissions to grow at 3% growth  and reach 70 million tons by 2060.  $27.2 B annually for United States
Fankhauser (1995) Estimated additional damage that would occur if air quality were allowed to deteriorate; Assumes increases in NOx emissions of 5.5% and increases in SO2 emissions of 2%. $15 B annually Worldwide

Source:  Climate Change 1995: Social and Economic Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press, 1996. 

 

Water Pollution

In addition to decreases in air quality, climate change is also anticipated to have negative impacts on water quality due to declines in runoff and river flow.  Since rivers often carry wastes, decreases in river flows will increase the amount of pollutants that will have to removed from areas through cleanup efforts.  Furthermore, increases in temperatures can also decrease the amount of dissolved oxygen content and increase algae growth in lakes{3}.

 

Migration 

Increases in sea level rise and decreases in soil quality due to climate change may also increase migration.  There is substantial concern that there will be increased migration from northern Africa to Europe as a result of climate change.  The US may witness increased migration from Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, and other countries{2}.

Estimates of the damages from this increase in migration may be found in the table below. 

Damage Estimates of Migration

Study Assumptions

Damage Estimates

Cline (1992) Assumes 640,000 legal immigrants and 130,000 illegal immigrants have entered the country annually in recent years; predicts a 25% increase in illegal migration and a 10% in legal immigration due to 2.5oC warming; looked at total per capita spending by state and local governments, assumed it would take 18 months before tax payments cover costs of services provided, and estimated costs of $4,500 per immigrant  $450 M annually for United States
Fankhauser (1995) Assumed estimates of Cline and extrapolated to the entire world $12.3 B annually Worldwide

Source:  Climate Change 1995: Social and Economic Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press, 1996. 

 

Human Amenity

Increased temperatures due to climate change are likely to have negative impacts on human amenity in some areas and negative effects on those living in other areas.  It would increase the occurrence of heat waves by at least three times than normal witnessed in some area, and yet reduce disamenities associated with cold winters in other areas.  

Presumably people would be willing to pay something to avoid the disamenity associated with increasing temperatures.  Cline estimated that if people are willing pay a mere .5% of their personal income for this purpose, then damages cause by such a disamenity would be $10 B annually in the United States{2}.

  Ecosystem and Biodiversity Loss

Although past research in this area is limited, climate change is likely to cause significant damage to ecosystems and biodiversity. Efforts to identify the value of species have been conducted through contingent valuation while damages incurred because of the loss of plant species have been estimated according to the probability that these species will prove useful to humans for medicinal purposes.  Because of the inherent difficulties of assessing the value of a species and uncertainties about which species shall be affected by climate change, estimates of these damages are necessarily tentative and will certainly require further research.  

The US EPA (1989) has indicated that climate change is likely to have serious implications for biodiversity because of destruction of habitat, predator/prey relationships, and physiological changes caused by increasing temperatures and the poleward migration of tree species.  The effects of temperature and species migration are amplified by the existence of natural and manmade barriers to resettlement{3}.    

Pearce (1993) attempted to elicit the values of various species and ecosystems through a contingent valuation, and the results of that survey are recorded in the table below.  

Valuation of Endangered Species and Prized Habitats

Country

Species or Habitat

Value (1990$/year/person)

Norway

Brown bear, wolf, wolverine

15

Conservation of rivers against hydorelectric development

59.0-107.0

United States

Bald eagle

12.4

Emerald shiner

4.5

Grizzly bear

18.5

Bighorn sheep

8.6

Whooping crane 

1.2

Blue whale

9.3

Bottlenose dolphin

7.0

California sea otter

8.1

Northern elephant seal

8.1

Humpback whalea

40-48(without information)

49-64 (with information)

Grand Canyon (visibility)

27.0

Colorado wilderness

9.3-21.2

Australia

Nadgee Nature Reserve

28.1

Kakadu Conservation Zoneb

93.0

United Kingdom

Nature reservesc

40.0

aRespondents divided into two groups, one which was given video information.                                                      

  bTwo scenarios of mining development damage were given to respondents.                                                       

cSurvey of informed citizens only.                                                                                                                    

Note:  People's willingness to pay (WTP) to preserve all listed species is not necessarily identical to the sum of individual WTP estimates, becasue of teh so-called embedding effect" (WTP estimates elicited in surveys depend on the "bundle of good" presented to the interviewee; see Mitchell and Carson, 1989).

Source:  Climate Change 1995: Social and Economic Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press, 1996.  

Pearce also evaluated the value of individual plant species, although his study focused on their potential medicinal uses.  Pearce (1993) noted that the use of approximately 40 plant species used for various prescription drugs drew $15-20 billion in sales during the 1980s (at 1990 prices).  He implied that the individual value of these species was $300 million.  Since it has been predicted that approximately 60,000 plant species will become extinct over the next 50 years, and the probability of a plant species being useful for medicinal purposes is between 1:10,000 and 1:1,000, Pearce inferred that 6-60 plant species with medicinal value could be lost.  Using a mean loss of 30 species and a value of $300 million per species, Pearce estimated the annual losses to the United States to be between $8.8 billion and $180 billion per year.  Assuming that climate change would account for just 10% of those losses, he estimated that the loss of plant species due to climate change to be in order of $1 billion to $18 billion per year{3}.   

Both of Pearce's studies have been used by other economists who have produced comprehensive estimates of damages from climate change, as the table below describes.    

Damage Estimates of Ecosystem and Biodiversity Loss

Study Assumptions Damages Estimates
Cline (1992) Assumes some loss, but makes no assumptions about the value of preserving species or ecosystems $4 B annually United States
Fankhauser (1995) Cites the Pearce survey presented above, but assumes a willingness-to-pay estimate of $30 per person per year to avoid the loss of ecosystems and biodiversity $40 B annually Worldwide

Source:  Climate Change 1995: Social and Economic Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press, 1996. 

 

Extreme Weather Events

Climate Change is anticipated to result in an increased occurrence of  extreme weather events such as hurricanes, windstorms, river floods, drought, as well as hot and cold spells.  To deal with the physical and financial damage caused by these events, governments will have to make appropriate capital investments, economic changes, and adaptations to social programs{3}.  

The impact of climate change on the occurrence of hurricanes is quite controversial.  Some scientists say that climate change will lead to an increase in the frequency and intensity of hurricanes as such weather is related to ocean surface temperatures.  Emanuel (1987), who has been cited by economists making relevant damage estimates, has argued there is a positive relationship between the occurrence of tropical storms and predicts a 40-50% increase in the destructive capabilities of hurricanes with a doubling in atmospheric concentrations of CO2.  Other scientists dispute these assertions.  Some scientists have found that climate change will have no impact on the frequency of hurricanes, while others believe that the number of hurricanes will actually decrease in intensity because of climate change.  Despite the lack of consensus on this issue, damage estimates of this impact are still included in a majority of comprehensive estimates of damages from climate change{3,4}.  

Climate change is also expected to increase the occurrence of river floods, drought, and hot and cold spells.  Little information is available concerning the social and economic impacts of these events.  Additionally, the impacts of drought and hot and cold spells have been addressed in considerable detail in other sections.  Therefore, this analysis shall focus on the impacts of hurricane damage. 

If climate change does induce the occurrence of extreme weather, governments will need to build dikes, reinforce structures to withstand strong winds and rain, encourage personal savings in preparation for extreme events, ensure adequate insurance coverage to compensate homeowners for losses, and restructure social programs to help people in dire need of financial assistance{3}.Predictions of damages expected due to increased frequency and intensity of hurricanes are described in the table below.

Damage Estimates from Increased Occurrence and Frequency of Hurricanes

Study Assumptions Damage Estimate
Cline (1992) Assumes 50% increase in hurricanes discussed by Emanuel; reviewed past damage of hurricanes in the United States $750 M annually for United States
Fankhauser (1995) Assumes that in the average year, there are between 70-80 tropical cyclones each year; assumes that the US is affected by 7% of all these storms, 29% occur in other OECD nations, and another 7% occur in China; assumes 50% in tropical storms; assumes 8,000 additional deaths to tropical storms (most occurring in developing countries), using a value of statistical life of  $100,000 to $1.5 M depending of income levels in the region $2.7 B annually Worldwide

Source:  Climate Change 1995: Social and Economic Dimensions of Climate Change. New York:  Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Back to top.