Home
Home
  
   
Introduction
Introduction

  
  
Technical Options
Technical
Options
  
Policy Tools
Policy
Tools
  
Actual Practices
Actual
Practices

Theory v. Practice
Theory v.
Practice

Conclusion
Conclusion

  
  

Biodiversity and Species Protection
the economic perspectiv
e


Damages

The loss of a species is permanent.   Although substitute products may exist for a particular species, the loss comes at a cost to society.

Spotted Owls

The loss of biodiversity has
even greater implications.  Economic damages associated with loss of biodiversity are not easily calculated.

One reason for this is that a societal marginal damages curve for biodiversity loss has never before been attempted.  There is one main barrier to determining a societal marginal damages curve:  valuing something that has no market associated with it is extremely difficult.  There are no price cues or demand functions that define just exactly at what point this species or that species, or all of biodiversity, is worth a given amount.   Without a value associated with biodiversity, a true cost of losing it cannot be determined.

To overcome that obstacle, several attempts have been made to value biodiversity by determining the cost or damages of not having it.  One method of doing so is based on the fact that biodiversity provides a host of services to the earth, including the human population.  Costs or damages are calculated by determining how much we humans would have to pay to reproduce the same services provided by biodiversity given that they no longer exist.  An example of this is what a city would have to pay to prevent or repair a flood control problem because the biodiversity that originally performed that service has gone extinct or populations reduced to such low levels that it cannot perform the service.

Another method of valuation is to determine how much an industry loses in net revenue because of a loss of biodiversity.  Because biodiversity is used as an input in many production processes, it has some value to the firms and to society in the case of pharmaceutical industries.  The value of the biodiversity is not merely what the firm paid for it as an input but also any revenue lost because of a loss of that input.

One of the major drawbacks of the above methods is that they include only the use values of biodiversity.  Some argue that biodiversity also has a non-use value, that is, an option value and/or an existence value.   Biodiversity has option value because people value the fact that it [biodiversity] is there for them to use when, and if, they should ever decide to.  The fact that they actually derive no benefits from it currently has no bearing on whether or not they could ever receive benefits from using it.  Biodiversity also has existence value because people derive satisfaction from knowing that biodiversity exists:  a loss of it would reduce their satisfaction.

Several examples of the different types of valuation are described below along with some anecdotal evidence of the value of biodiversity.

  
Valuing biodiversity services:

The economic damage from biodiversity loss is often calculated from the value of the species had it not gone extinct or been damaged beyond use.  Consequently, market values of certain products are equal to the monetary cost of losing that species by having to pay for the services that it once provided.
  • The 20 pharmaceuticals most used in the United States are based on natural chemicals; these drugs have a combined sales value of $6 billion per year.
  • Genetic diversity in the development of new varieties of agricultural crops in the United States has increased the value of the harvest by an average of $1 million per year from 1930-1980.
     
  • The U.S. Marine Fisheries Service has estimated that the commercial fish and shellfish industries and the sport fishing industry has suffered nearly $200 million in lost revenue because of damage to the estuaries that provide habitat for these species or maintain the health of the species' habitat.


Valuing Particular Species:
Quite often the products or services derived from species or ecosystems have high market values.

  • The wild cascara bark that grows in the western United States is used in certain brands of laxatives.  Harvesters of this bark earn approximately $1 million per year and the retail price of the medicine is around $75 million per year.
     
  • The marshland region surrounding Boston, MA has been valued at $72,000 per hectare per year based solely on the basis of its role in reducing flood damage.
     
  • The recreational value of natural environments in the United States alone is estimated at $4 billion.
     
Existence Value:
A number of people value the existence of biodiversity and individual species, without ever having to derive direct use from them.  Members of environmental organizations may fall into this category.
  • Eighty-four percent of the 1997 revenue of Defenders of Wildlife was due to membership dues, bequests, and contributions.

The School of Public and Environmental Affairs
Copyright 1999 Indiana University Bloomington
Comments: kenricha@indiana.edu