|
Recent/Frequently
Requested Research Articles
NEPA and the Forest
Service
Internal Organization and External Contracting
for the NEPA Process:
Lessons from New Institutional
Economics and Strategic Organizational Design
(Draft Report for U.S. Forest Service, in review).
Policy Instruments
The Rationality of State-Level Fees for Hazardous Waste Management: The
Case of the Midwest Region of the United States
(Draft)
The Instrument Choice Game:
When Do Environmental Taxes Win? (Chapter
4 in Critical Issues in International
Environmental Taxation: International and
Comparative Perspectives Volume 1, 2003)
Framing
Environmental Policy Instrument Choice. 10 Duke Environmental
Law & Policy Forum
221, 2000.
A Grateful Response
to Comments on Framing Environmental Policy Instrument Choice
10
Duke Environmental
Law & Policy Forum
425, 2000.
Carbon
Sequestration
"The National
Inventory Approach
for International Forest-carbon Sequestration
Management"
"International
Forest Carbon Sequestration in a Post-Kyoto Agreement"
Discussion
Paper 08-11, Harvard Project on
International Climate Agreements, Belfer Center for Science and
International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
October 2008
“What is in the Sink? Technological
Capacity to Support a National Inventory Approach to International
Carbon Sequestration Commitments.”
Climatic
Change (2009) 93:69–101
Agricultural and Forestlands: U.S. Carbon Policy Strategies.
Report for the
Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2006.
“The
Cost of U.S. Forest-based Carbon Sequestration.” Report
for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2005.
A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies: A Dozen Years of
Research
Climatic
Change, 63 (1-2):1-48, 2004
A Brief Overview of Carbon Sequestration Economics and Policy
Environmental
Management 33(4):545-558,
2004
The
Leaky Sink:
Persistent Obstacles to a
Forest Carbon
Sequestration Program
Based on Individual
Projects. Climate Policy 1 (2001) 41-54,
2001.
Implementing an
International Carbon
Sequestration Program: Can the
Leaky Sink be
Fixed?
Climate Policy 1(2001): 173-188,
2001.
The Time Value of Carbon in Bottom-Up Studies. Critical Reviews
in Envrionemtnal Science and Technology, 27(Special):S279-S292
(1997)
Costs of
Sequestering Carbon Through Tree Planting and Forest Management in the
United States. United State Forest Service GTR WO-58 (1990).
Environmental
Valuation
Putting a Price Tag on Nature.
Issues
in Science and Technology Winter 1997/1998
|
